Monday, July 28, 2008

INSURANCE PRICING CAN CUT GAS USE

Hartford Courant

July 28, 2008
Search
Login or register
Text size: increase text sizedecrease text size
Insurance Pricing Can Cut Gas Use

JASON BORDOFF AND PASCAL NOEL
July 28, 2008

Faced with record high gas prices and the November elections, not a day goes by without a politician's pitch to provide consumers with some relief — be it to permit offshore drilling, crack down on speculators, curb inventories in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve or grant a gas tax holiday. Yet each of these policies would have a negligible impact on gas prices.

The truth is that there is little lawmakers can do in the short run to reduce prices at the pump. Current high oil prices are primarily a result of rising global demand and tight supply, along with a weak dollar. On the positive side, high gas prices have the benefit of encouraging consumers to reduce oil consumption and miles driven by taking mass transit, carpooling, buying more fuel-efficient cars, or living closer to work. Still, many people are being genuinely hurt by record gas prices and want some relief.

NOTE: GAS PRICES INDEED CREATED NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE MAJORITY.

What if there were a way to lower the cost of driving for most people while still encouraging people to drive less and use less oil? There is: It's called pay-as-you-drive insurance, whereby insurance is priced per mile driven rather than in a lump-sum amount each year.

Under our current auto insurance system, similar drivers pay nearly the same premiums if they drive 5,000 miles a year as if they drive 50,000 miles. Just as an all-you-can-eat restaurant encourages more eating, all-you-can-drive insurance pricing leads people to drive more. Pricing auto insurance per mile driven provides an extra incentive to reduce driving and thus would reduce our nation's dependence on oil, as well as reduce accidents, congestion, carbon emissions and local pollution. The system would also be more equitable since currently low-mileage drivers, who tend to be low-income people, subsidize insurance costs for high-mileage drivers.

Our new paper from the Hamilton Project at the Brookings Institution estimates that if all motorists paid for accident insurance per mile driven rather than in a lump sum per year, that extra incentive to drive less would lead to an 8 percent reduction in miles driven. To put that in perspective, it would take a $1-a-gallon increase in the gasoline tax to achieve the same reduction in driving, based on 2007 average retail gas prices. That means 5 percent less oil consumed and 2 percent fewer carbon emissions. In total, we estimate net social benefits of between $50 billion and $60 billion per year.

And we could achieve these gains while also saving most drivers money. We estimate that roughly two-thirds of households would end up paying less for auto insurance, with each of those households saving an average of $270 per car. The premiums would still be adjusted for various risk factors — so an urban 25-year old with a sports car and a DWI record would pay a higher per-mile insurance premium than a middle-age rural driver with a spotless driving record.

Most states' regualtions do not permit pay-as-you-drive insurance, so states should take the necessary steps to remove those barriers. The federal government can do its part by funding pilot projects and offering tax credits to offset some of the costs incurred by insurers to monitor miles traveled.

As record-high gas prices squeeze American households, pay-as-you-drive insurance could offset some of that pain by reducing driving costs for the majority of people. Those who cut back on driving to save money on gas would also enjoy reduced insurance premiums.

NOTE: THIS IS DEFINITELY GOOD NEWS TO EVERYONE.

Pay-as-you-drive can reduce our oil consumption, help the environment and reduce other driving-related harms, while also saving most drivers money. Good for drivers, in this case, is also good for society.

Jason Bordoff and Pascal Noel are policy director and research analyst, respectively, at the Brookings Institution's Hamilton Project. This was distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
EmailE-mail
Share

* Digg
* Del.icio.us
* Facebook
* Fark
* Google
* Newsvine
* Reddit
* Yahoo

PrintPrint
ReprintReprint
Related topic galleries: Petroleum Industry, Business Institutions, Personal Income, Vehicles, Prices
All topics

Copyright © 2008, The Hartford Courant

We encourage you to share your thoughts about our stories. However, comments that are obscene, overly personal, racist or otherwise inappropriate will be removed. Because the messages are posted instantly and anonymously, Courant.com cannot vouch for their accuracy or authenticity. Report abusive posts by clicking the link found at the upper right of each item. -- Courant.com
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post) You are currently logged in as . Not ?
Name
(appears on your post)
Registration Welcome to Topix Forums! Please fill out the form below to set up an account and post your comment. If you are a returning user, click here to log in.

*

Topix Username

Will display with your forum posts
*

Email Address

Will never be shown to other users
*

Password

At least five characters (letters and numbers)
*


Confirm Password
*

Birthdate

Required by COPPA
*

Login Sign in with your existing Topix account and write your comments below. Don't have an account?

Email Address

Password

Forgot your password?

Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:


Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

* Classifieds
o Jobs
o Cars
o Real Estate
o Apartments
o Items For Sale
o Place An Ad
* News
* Sports
* Business
* iTowns
* Entertainment
* Features
* Travel
* Video
* Opinion
o Editorials
o Commentary
o Other Opinion
o Letters
o Place
o Columnists
* Obituaries
* Traffic
* Shopping
* Topics (Beta)
* eCourant
* Weather
*
local radar
Radar: rain alert
* Resources
o Site Map
o Lottery
o Mobile News
o Text Alerts
o RSS Feeds
o Mortgages
o Coupons
* Advertise With Us
o Newspaper Classified
o Newspaper Retail
o Online
o Media Kit
o Contact Us
* Newspaper Services
o Subscribe
o Subscriber Services
o Archives
o Reprints
o Newspaper Ads
o Courant Jobs
o About Us
o View Page 1

Columnists
Read our opinion columnists. ... and our bloggers
• Karen Hunter: Reader Representative
Popular stories

* Roger Catlin: 'Mad Men' And 'Hannah Montana And Miley Cyrus' Make For Can't-Lose TV
* Rattled Americans Try Their Lottery Luck In Hard Times
* House Held A Brother And Sister's Gruesome Secret: Their Mother's Body
* Jonas Brothers Elicit Screams, Devotion
* Favre Agrees Not To Report

More most viewed

* House Held A Brother And Sister's Gruesome Secret: Their Mother's Body
* Rattled Americans Try Their Lottery Luck In Hard Times
* Advocates Seek Aid For Homeless Female Veterans
* Kevin Rennie: A Star Turn For Elizabeth Edwards
* Surge In Sound Jellyfish Sightings May Be From Weather

More most e-mailed

* University of Connecticut
* Police
* Soccer
* Prosecution
* Major League Baseball

More topics

* Most viewed
* Most e-mailed
* Hot topics

1 comment:

Unknown said...

I had never considered the correlation between auto insurance coverage and the amount of driving someone does. Having all-you-can drive insurance would encourage driving high mileage, similar to an all-you-can eat buffet encourages binge eating. It is wise to consider having the necessary coverage that may encourage you to drive less miles. Less time on the road means less likelihood for an auto accident.
http://www.insurewithgreenlight.com/insurance-products/personal-insurance-products/